|
|
The
Nation Review
You
may recall Insomnia as a Norwegian film made on a modest budget-do
I repeat myself?-about the inner life of a morally compromised police
detective. The picture enjoyed a small but respectable run in the
United States a couple of years ago, thanks to the shambling presence
of Stellan Skarsgard in the lead and to the clever use of locations.
The director, Erik Skjoldbjaerg, set the action in the north of
Norway, during summer, so that this film noir played out almost
entirely in daylight.
Now
comes a new, American Insomnia, made to the costly standards of
a Warner Bros. release. Directed by Christopher Nolan in the wake
of his surprise hit Memento, this remake transposes the action to
rural Alaska and replaces the not-quite-stellar Skarsgard with Al
Pacino. A few paragraphs from now, I will recommend this picture
to your attention. First, though, let me talk about a modestly budgeted
American movie, The Believer, since it has the distinction of being
a film of ideas-in contrast to Insomnia, a film of idea. I care
about The Believer, first of all, because its writer-director, Henry
Bean, has noticed a truth that escapes most American filmmakers:
People think about things. For most of us, of course, at most times,
our notions of the world amount to a discontinuous, self-contradicting
jumble; but it's a jumble on which we may stake our lives. That's
why the disorderliness can be dramatic in itself-provided, as Bean
knows, that the ideas trouble the mind of a compelling enough character.
So
here is young Danny Balint, played unforgettably in The Believer
by the whiplike Ryan Gosling. Think of him as Robert De Niro in
Taxi Driver, only leaner, more delicate in features and infinitely
more articulate. Danny hunches and glowers and struts and slinks
through the streets of New York City, his close-cropped head buzzing
with mutually incompatible versions of Jewish identity, his brain
bursting with arguments about God and against God. Danny wishes
with all his heart to be someone other than a young man of ideas-but
it's his fate to be cerebral, which is what makes him so moving
and so horrible. He is a yeshiva-educated Jew who wants to live
in the blood, as a Nazi activist.
Now,
I've hesitated to write about The Believer, in part because I happen
to know Henry Bean and in part because I was never sure when the
picture would get into theaters. The Believer won the Grand Jury
Prize at the Sundance festival in 2001 but then failed to find a
theatrical distributor. (According to The Independent magazine,
the phones stopped ringing after a preview audience at the Simon
Wiesenthal Center felt The Believer might be bad for the Jews.)
The filmmakers decided to go straight to cable and signed a deal
with Showtime, which announced a television premiere in late September
2001-not a propitious air date, as it turned out, for a movie about
an intense guy in New York City who plans to blow things up. But
since Showtime has gotten around to presenting The Believer (in
March of this year), I want to say a few words about the picture,
now that audiences may at last face Danny in the public space of
a movie theater.
Those
who choose to do so will discover that The Believer starts in two
locations at once, on the subway and inside Danny's skull. In the
exterior setting, Danny is a twentyish skinhead, who when first
seen is methodically harassing a bespectacled, yarmulke-wearing
youth on the elevated train. Danny crowds the prey, crunching his
Doc Marten boots all over the guy's wing-tips. Then, when the victim
behaves like a victim-avoiding eye contact, fleeing the subway at
the first opportunity-Danny pursues him onto the street. "Hit
me! Please!" Danny howls. The less resistance he gets, the
more enraged he becomes, till he stomps the timid, book-toting Jew.
Meanwhile,
through cross-cutting, we also get access to Danny's memory, in
which he's forever the pale student with big eyeglasses. We see
Danny in the yeshiva at about age 12-just another of the boys, except
for his rage against the patriarch Abraham, who was willing to slaughter
his own son as an offering to God. None of the standard, moralized
readings of this tale will assuage Danny. He insists that Abraham's
sacrifice made the Jews into a race of willing victims, perpetually
crushed by a God who holds them to be worthless.
You
see why this stuff can make people nervous. It's not just that Danny
takes Jewish self-hatred to its ultimate conclusion-he takes it
there theologically, argumentatively, with a foul-mouthed, spray-the-room
exuberance that will offend every moviegoer. Zionists, for example,
will object when Danny says the Israelis aren't real Jews-they have
soil, and the kind of manliness a fascist like him can respect.
Supporters of the Palestinians, on the other hand, will cringe to
hear Danny denounce the massacre at Sabra and Shatila. (With friends
like this.)
But
I'm making The Believer sound like a string of provocations, and
it's not. It's a modernist tragedy, meaning one that's realized
with equal measures of sympathy and irony. When Danny tries to enlist
in an "above-ground, intellectually serious fascist movement,"
its leaders (Theresa Russell and Billy Zane) welcome his anti-Semitic
tirades but dismiss his offer to kill Jews. Instead, to his horror,
they make him into a fundraiser, with a suit and a cell phone. When
Danny hooks up with a dreamily masochistic young Aryan (Summer Phoenix),
it isn't long before she decides to study Hebrew, hangs a mezuzah
on the door and starts wearing ankle-length dresses. Yes, hit me!
Please! The harder Danny tries to be a Nazi, the more ineluctably
he's a Jew.
I
begin to think of Hazel Motes, the protagonist of Flannery O'Connor's
Wise Blood, who is a Christian preacher in spite of himself. According
to O'Connor, Hazel's integrity lies in his not being able to rid
himself of Jesus: "Does one's integrity ever lie in what he
is not able to do? I think that usually it does, for free will does
not mean one will, but many wills conflicting in one man."
In the same way, many wills conflict in Danny, with that of the
faithful Jew refusing to die away. At one point, in fact, Danny
secretly wraps a prayer shawl around his torso, much as Hazel wound
himself in penitential barbed wire. Then, like any good yeshiva
boy, Danny lets the fringes dangle beneath the T-shirt, which in
his case is emblazoned with a swastika.
It's
good to see someone take such care with his appearance. Most American
movies these days are little more than fashion statements-and yet
the characters are shockingly thoughtless about their clothes.
So
we come to Al Pacino's leather jacket.
It
plays quite a prominent role in Insomnia, a movie whose premise
goes like this: Someone in the remote town of Nightmute, Alaska,
has murdered a high school girl. The victim clearly knew her killer,
and the local population is neither large nor highly mobile. Nevertheless,
the Nightmute police feel too humble to work the case on their own.
They send for help-though not from Nome or Anchorage, nor even from
Seattle, Portland or San Francisco. They go all the way to Los Angeles,
whose police department immediately agrees to dispatch two of its
top detectives, despite their being under investigation by Internal
Affairs.
I
tried explaining all this to my friend Ben Sonnenberg, who seemed
puzzled. "But what about Eddie Murphy?" he asked. "Was
he too busy to come from Detroit?"
Reassure
yourself, Ben. Eddie has answered the call, in effect if not in
person. That's the point of the leather jacket.
It's
hard to imagine Pacino's character, Detective Will Dormer, going
out and buying this item for himself. It's a little too heavy for
the climate in LA, a little too pimp-chic for a cop who's supposed
to be an agonized moralist. With its supple new leather, the jacket
looks more like something that was recently issued to the guy-which,
of course, it was. The filmmakers decided this was just the thing
to signal "cool, hip and streetwise" for Pacino. In much
the same way, they imposed a symbolic costume on the murderer, Robin
Williams. Although the script says he's vain and attracted to luxury,
Williams is draped in something that says "phony, out-of-touch
intellectual": a corduroy jacket.
Don't
worry, by the way, that I've revealed the killer's identity. You'd
be able to figure it out for yourself, by process of elimination,
no more than ten minutes into the movie, which is about twenty minutes
before Williams comes into the open. The mystery of Insomnia has
nothing to do with discovering he's the murderer and everything
to do with his somehow being able to deliver a restrained, nuanced,
convincingly chilling performance. There's Robin Williams, taking
care of business, while everybody else is goofing off.
Pacino
behaves ridiculously, as he typically does when the script's a laugh.
Hilary Swank has no such history of egregious mugging; but now,
in the role of a local cop, she bounces onto the screen like a young
squirrel on its first day of acorn school. Who allowed these performances,
or maybe even encouraged them? Christopher Nolan, that's who. He
was so intent on dolloping pizazz onto this story that he didn't
notice the visual syrup was drowning a six-inch stack of toaster
waffles.
I'm
sure Insomnia will have its champions, even so. They'll claim the
picture is About Something, namely the importance of never, ever
breaking the rules. That's the one, big idea of Insomnia. As we
may learn from life and better movies, it's wrong.
-
Stuart Klawans
|