|
|
LA
Weekly - Bean & Nothingness
Twenty
minutes into an overflow screening of The Believer at the 2001 Sundance
Film Festival, I was enthralled -- and scribbling in my notes that
the movie will never fly with audiences who are not obsessed Jews
like me, let alone snag a distributor. Henry Bean's fevered tale
of an Orthodox Jew who remodels himself into a Nazi skinhead, then
rediscovers his roots in the Torah and ends up living a vibrantly
terrible double life as a Jew and a fascist, is a capable thriller
with emotional intensity to burn and more than a few sly laughs.
But Bean's script is laden with Midrashic commentary on the Jewish
Torah; its star is a relatively unknown, if prodigiously talented,
young Canadian actor; and the supporting cast is resolutely B-list
and below. The Believer brought down the house at Sundance and went
on to win a Grand Jury award, which ordinarily is enough to draw
a swarm of big independent distributors, cash in hand. They sniffed,
but didn't buy. The critics liked the movie, and it played to appreciative
audiences at festivals in Moscow and Munich, neither of which is
famed for its philo-Semitic culture, and in Israel, where it was
most likely to give offense. It's done very well in commercial release
in England, a country with a long and queasy tradition of tolerating
its Jews, on condition they don't act Jewish. But in the United
States, home to one of the biggest, freest and least put-upon Jewish
communities in the world, the movie couldn't find a distributor.
It didn't help that Rabbi Abraham Cooper of the Simon Wiesenthal
Center, a self-appointed film critic and gatekeeper to Hollywood
of movies with Jewish content, told potential buyer Paramount Classics
that the film didn't work: It lacked a good script, failed to provide
motivation for the protagonist, and, he said, one crucial scene
of a synagogue desecration offered a potential "primer for
anti-Semitism." Although Cooper's may have been no more than
the vote that tipped the scales in an industry notoriously skittish
about making films with Jewish themes, Paramount did, in fact, pass,
whereupon Showtime jumped in and bought the movie for cable. Then
came September 11, with its attendant Hollywood nervousness about
terrorist themes. Now, at last, IDP, the distribution arm of The
Believer's production company, Fireworks Pictures, is giving the
film a modest bicoastal release, to be followed, if all goes well,
by 20 top markets around the country.
At the outset, The Believer announces itself as a simple story of
Jewish self-hatred. Danny Balint, played by Ryan Gosling (former
Mouseketeer, cohort of Britney Spears) with a taut blend of contempt,
icy intelligence and naked vulnerability, is a young man driven
by opposing forces. He's the puny, bespectacled yeshiva bocher arguing
with his Hebrew teacher about the power of God; and he's the sneering,
muscled uberkind in a swastika T-shirt who likes to beat the shit
out of puny, bespectacled yeshiva bochers. Obsessed with powerful
fathers (God, Abraham) and powerless children (Isaac, the rest of
us), Danny is, to all outward appearances, the powerful son of a
weak, broken father. So dedicated a hater is Danny of himself and
the forces that have shaped him that he is willing to try to annihilate
both. Fascism is his ticket out of Judaism -- and, as the consequences
of his defection and his betrayals come home to roost, his ticket
back into it. The Torah is Danny's scourge, and his delight; his
shame, and his pride.
Like many truly preposterous fictional characters, Danny Balint
is drawn from life. In October 1965, The New York Times ran an interview
with Daniel Burros, a former member of the American Nazi Party who
had become King Kleagle in a local chapter of the Ku Klux Klan.
When the reporter confronted Burros with the fact that he was a
Jew, the young man threatened to kill both the writer and himself
if his cover was blown. One hour after the story appeared, Burros
shot himself in the head. It wasn't until 10 years after Burros'
death that Henry Bean and his friend Mark Jacobson, neither of whom
was in the film business yet, toyed with the idea of making a movie
out of it. "Like millions of others," Bean wrote in an
essay recently published together with The Believer's screenplay
and several commentaries by prominent Jewish scholars, "we
spent a good deal of time imagining the films we would make without
imagining very hard that we would actually make them. For this purpose,
the 'Danny Burros Story' was perfect: the craziness, the self-destructive
fury and, above all, the endless ironies."
Bean did manage to write a short treatment, which he and Jacobson
submitted to Dustin Hoffman's production company. They never heard
back, and dropped the project when, in the early '70s, Jacobson
moved to New York to study journalism. In 1977, Bean took off for
Los Angeles to become a screenwriter. The Jewish-Nazi project languished
for 15 years. "It wasn't that I was lazy or even stupid,"
writes Bean. "Perhaps, as with my inability to keep kosher
or honor the Sabbath, there was a terror of what happiness I might
find, like someone afraid to fall in love." By the time Bean
returned to the project in earnest in the early '90s, his life had
undergone a sea change, one that led him to make his character,
unlike Daniel Burros, an Orthodox Jew.
It has taken 25 years for Bean to make The Believer, and about that
long for him to become the man he is today -- an unbelieving, practicing
Jew whose idea of a good time is to pass a Shabbat morning in close
reading of the Torah. A genial, middle-aged, happily married Manhattanite,
Bean couldn't be more different from The Believer's tortured antihero.
Notwithstanding the busy cell phone and natty new laptop he brings
with him to the conference room at Fireworks Pictures, Bean comes
across much more like the sometime novelist he is than like a top
screenwriter of high-end thrillers such as Internal Affairs, Deep
Cover and Enemy of the State. Spend time with him, and it quickly
becomes apparent why he originally conceived The Believer as an
absurdist American romp: It wouldn't occur to everyone to cast Billy
Zane and Theresa Russell as neo-Nazi theoreticians. A short, wiry
man with the wisecracking exuberance of a New York--Jewish intellectual,
Bean is funny and irreverent, with a touch of Catskills in his delivery.
(On Lillian Hellman: "Horrible. Horrible. I hate that woman.
Fortunately she's dead.") He is also -- not unlike Danny --
soulful, serious, intense, and possessed of a restless intellect
that convinces you that he really has read Baudrillard, Derrida,
Pound and Eliot. He talks like a man who's either been psychoanalyzed
or read his way through Freud, or both. And, like Danny, who reveals
his double identity as compulsively as he hides it, he's entranced
by the dialectic of opposites. "I find Danny heroic,"
he says, "because I feel that he's acknowledging the contradictory
pulls within himself."
Bean reminds me of the Jews I grew up with and, given the choice,
still hang out with on a regular basis -- secular, analytical, somewhat
rootless, besotted with irony, yet still hankering after a spiritual
life. Except that Bean has found his spiritual path. Without it,
he says, The Believer would never have been made. Born and raised
in a Philadelphia suburb -- his father was a lawyer, his mother
a housewife -- Bean comes from the kind of family known in the London
Jewish community of my youth as TTAY Jews (that's "three times
a year"). The Beans lit candles on Friday nights, went to Reform
temple (where Bean's father was president) on the high holy days,
celebrated Passover and Hanukkah -- and enjoyed their Christmas
tree. Sparring with his father at the dinner table schooled Bean
in the rhythms and cadences of Talmudic debate. Still, his was a
minimal Jewish education, and yet, like most Jews of the post--World
War II generation, he and his family and friends never stopped talking
about the fact that they were Jewish, and about who else was Jewish,
a practice Bean continues to this day. He can't help himself: This
is the particular obsession of assimilated Jews who feel not quite
American and not quite Jewish, who remain vaguely wedded to their
tradition even as they feel it slipping away. "My father walks
through graveyards on Normandy beach and looks for the Stars of
David," says Bean. I counter that when my parents went to concerts
at the Royal Festival Hall in London, their first order of business
was to look down the orchestra list and identify the Jewish names.
We laugh, the nervous laughter of children owning up to the fact
that the distance they've traveled from their families is shorter
than they sometimes like to think.
To Bean, that sense of feeling Jewish just because he didn't feel
like a full-fledged American seemed like a poor excuse for an identity.
"It was as if I had this identity that was one of the biggest
things in my life," he says, "but there was no content
to it." Had he not met his wife, Leora Barish, whom he clearly
admires as well as adores (her screenplay for Desperately Seeking
Susan, he says, was "much darker and funnier than the film.
It made Thelma and Louise possible"), Bean might have drifted
away from Judaism altogether. Barish, known around the set of The
Believer as "Rock," coached Ryan Gosling -- who grew up
Mormon -- in Hebrew and Jewish ritual. Gosling thinks of her as
Bean's muse: "He makes everything for her and is very inspired
by her. If Rock likes it, we move ahead." The daughter of a
Jewish Army chaplain, Barish had a rigorous Jewish education from
which she, like many children of the counterculture, had become
estranged. Still, in the early years of their marriage the couple
argued about Judaism all the time, and when their first child was
born, Barish, out of the blue, began attending services at Mishkon
Tephilo, a Conservative synagogue in Venice. Bean soon joined her,
began taking classes in Torah and very gradually became observant.
Today Bean keeps a kosher home and goes to shul three times a month
at Ansche Chesed, the beautiful, tony Conservative synagogue on
Manhattan's Upper West Side in which several crucial scenes in The
Believer were shot. "I'm still not very observant," he
says. "But observance is like exercise or yoga. You start,
and then you want to go further, and you want to go further . .
." Judaism, says Bean, is "not a religion of belief. It's
a religion of practice, of doing things. I have this argument espoused
by Danny in the film that you can be an atheist and practice Judaism
and there's no contradiction. Judaism works fine without God, you
just do the stuff and it makes you feel good, it ties you into a
community, it gives your life organization, ways to reflect on questions
that everybody reflects on. I make it what I want it to be."
Bean's comfortable, mix-and-match Judaism is a peculiarly American
phenomenon, not uncommon among Jews who grew up with minimal religious
training. Depending on which Jewish theologian you talk to, his
approach will either save Judaism from extinction or dilute it to
death. Bean doesn't worry much about the survival of Judaism. He's
too busy studying the Torah, a practice that involves endless reinterpretation
of the texts. He belongs to a minyan, a Torah study group, and writes
his own short commentaries from time to time.
From a certain perspective, Danny's struggle with his religion in
The Believer is a dvar torah, a Torah commentary, in its own right.
For all its studied excess, The Believer is less a provocation about
the extremes of Jewish and Nazi identity than it is a meditation
on Jewish identity in general. Certainly it's an unfashionable,
even anachronistic one in America, where Jewish identity typically
is informed either by indifference or by the Holocaust. Twice in
The Believer, Danny is told, first by a neofascist and then by a
secular Jewish stock investor, that there is no Jewish problem anymore,
that anti-Semitism is dead and nobody cares. This is the dilemma
of Jewish identity in an open society. "If Judaism is not defined
negatively," says Bean, "then Danny doesn't know how to
know himself without that oppression." Hence Danny's statement
to a group of visibly twitchy weekend fascists that if Hitler hadn't
existed, the Jews would have had to invent him.
A book written after the Daniel Burros case by Abe Rosenthal and
Arthur Gelb, both at that time rising stars at The New York Times,
portrayed Burros as a self-hating casualty of the Holocaust. Had
Bean chosen to follow that line of reasoning, it's likely The Believer
would have had a smoother path to distribution. To the extent that
Jewish themes have seeped into recent Hollywood movies, it's been
through the prism of the European Jewish experience in World War
II, which offers an easily digested narrative arc from oppression
to nobility. Though the Shoah has its place in The Believer -- for
all his hatred of the "weak Jew," Danny is haunted by
a story told him by Holocaust survivors about a little boy whose
father fails to protect him from the Nazis -- Danny's fierce hatred
of Jewish passivity runs against the passion of American Jews, in
an age of identity politics and the culture of the victim, for repossessing
the Holocaust as their own story.
Whether as a Jew or as a writer of tales of power for the movies,
Bean shares Danny's unease with narratives of Jewish weakness. "To
me, the Holocaust as a defining attribute of Judaism is a nightmare,"
he says. "It's really a German story in the most basic Drama
101 sense. The Germans are the actors, the ones who make it happen.
And that's why the Jews are just victims, and why today they are
having this defining experience around a) they're victimized and
b) they don't do anything except die, a and rather shamefully. And
what's happened is that the Holocaust has become this cudgel that
can be used on people." Small wonder that Rabbi Cooper and
the Wiesenthal Center, whose goal is to keep the Holocaust alive
in the American psyche, objected to The Believer.
"The
Holocaust, for all its horrible magnificence," says Bean, "is
not nearly as interesting or complex as this absolutely unparalleled
tradition, this unique, magnificent, incredibly profound tradition
that has produced one of the great cultures of the world. That's
what I wanted to talk about in my movie." But even the movie's
dialogue with religion was a problem for Rabbi Cooper, who was offended
by a scene in which Danny and his Nazi pals lay waste to a synagogue.
At the time, Bean was infuriated by Cooper's response, which he
had solicited. Though he's more philosophical -- or diplomatic --
today, he still can't resist giving Cooper a little shove: "I
thought of having a coda saying 'No Torah was desecrated in the
making of this film.'"
In fact, The Believer grew precisely out of the scene that so rattled
Cooper, and that serves as a turning point in Danny's rabid rejection
of the very tradition Bean has grown to love. When, in the synagogue,
Danny and his fellow thugs begin to defile the Torah, we see him
trying to conceal his anger and anxiety. He steals the Torah, takes
it home, lovingly repairs it, wraps a prayer shawl around his waist,
then struts around giving the Nazi salute and chanting the prayer
that accompanies the removal of the Torah from the ark. Thereafter
he lives a schizoid life, part Jew, part Nazi, two irreconcilable
tracks that can only end in disaster.
Though Danny Balint is a personification, however exaggerated, of
the dilemma of the modern Jew, who can't live with his Judaism,
yet can't live without it, that's not the only reason Bean stubbornly
resisted redeeming him to reassure the audience. "I am really
a creature of excess, at least in my imaginative life," he
says. "I liked the operatic, over-the-top-ness of it."
Indeed, he sees Danny as a Dostoyevskian figure. "As Danny's
life becomes increasingly schizoid, he becomes more completely himself.
He's going to play the whole thing out, and I find that heroic.
It's terribly destructive to be that way, because you can't live
a life that admits everything. But the impulse to do so, though
very adolescent, is nevertheless grand."
Maybe a little too grand, even for the indie crowd. Though The Believer
received four nominations for the Independent Feature Project Spirit
Awards last March, it took away not a single prize. Perhaps the
movie was a provocation on too many fronts -- too Jewish, too unresolved,
too unwilling to cede an inch of ground to American political correctness,
and, finally, too vocal and funny on subjects we've been trained
to treat with silent reverence. Perhaps the movie creates a hero
we can't bear, a man who owns to what is worst in him, as well as
what is best. Perhaps, in our resurgently fanatical age, we can
only avert our gaze from a man of such extremes. Nothing deterred,
Bean is hard at work (with his old friend Nicholas Kazan) on a new
movie about another fanatic, a man who is being driven crazy by
the noise in New York City and who, once he tries to do something
about it, can't stop, even though his efforts are hopeless. "It's
a comedy, obviously," says Bean with a wolfish grin. "But
I hope the noise in the film functions a bit like the rats in The
Plague."
-
Ella Taylor |